top of page

#26 You've decided. Now what?

  • Writer: Mel Fox Dhar
    Mel Fox Dhar
  • Feb 18
  • 3 min read

Last week I wrote about why capable people stall mid-search — how most of the time it's not a tactics problem, it's a compression problem. The direction isn't tight enough for effort to compound.


A few of you wrote back and said:

I've made the decision. I know what I'm going after. It's still slow.


So this week I want to talk about what comes after the decision.

Because that part is less obvious than people think.

And it's where a lot of senior searches quietly lose weeks.


The decision is the starting line, not the halfway point

Most people treat "I know what I want" as the hard part.

And it is hard.

But it's also where a lot of people exhale and shift into doing mode — updating the resume, reaching out to contacts, starting to apply.

Without building the layer between the decision and the activity.

That layer is what I think of as the campaign architecture.

And skipping it is how smart people end up busy but not gaining ground.


What that layer actually looks like

There are a few things that separate a search that's moving from one that just feels like it's moving.


A target list that's been worked, not just assembled.

Not "here are 30 companies I'd consider."


More like: "Here are 8 where I have a specific thesis for why I'd be valuable — and I know who I need to reach inside 5 of them."


The difference matters because it changes how you spend your time. A long list keeps you in browsing mode. A short, reasoned list puts you in pursuit mode.


Materials that are tuned per target, not per job post.

Your resume and LinkedIn shouldn't be a general portrait of your career. They should be a specific argument for why someone like you belongs in a specific kind of role.


Most people build one strong resume and send it everywhere.


That's better than a weak resume. But it's still leaving positioning on the table.


The version of you that's compelling to a Series C startup is not the same version that's compelling to a mature enterprise team — even if the title is identical.


A weekly operating rhythm.

This one sounds mundane. It is.


But searches fall apart in the gaps between activity. You do a burst of outreach on Monday, get busy with life, and pick it up again eight days later having lost the thread on three conversations.


The people who close fast almost always have a simple structure: these are my targets, this is what I'm doing this week, this is what I'm waiting on.


Not a project plan. Just enough scaffolding to keep threads from going cold.


A story that's been pressure-tested out loud, not just on paper.

You can write a sharp positioning statement and still stumble through the first 90 seconds of a call.


The gap between how something reads and how it sounds when a VP asks "so why are you looking?" is real.


The fix isn't more rehearsal — it's getting honest feedback from someone who'll tell you where the story loses energy or gets vague.


Most people don't do this because it's uncomfortable. That's exactly why it works.


Why this matters more at senior levels

At senior levels, the hiring process is slower, more relational, and less forgiving of scattered signals.


You're often being compared to four other people who are also perfectly qualified.

The margin isn't in your experience — it's in how clearly you present, how deliberately you've approached the opportunity, and whether you seem like someone who's chosen this role specifically or someone who's exploring broadly.


That's not a charisma thing. It's a preparation thing.


And it compounds — the person who shows up with a clear thesis for why this company, this role, right now creates a different kind of conversation than the person who's "really excited about the opportunity."


A useful exercise

Pick the company at the top of your list right now. Then answer three questions in writing:

  1. What's the problem this team is likely trying to solve in the next 12 months?

  2. What have I done — specifically — that makes me credible on that problem?

  3. If I had 60 seconds with the hiring manager, what would I want them to remember?


If you can answer those cleanly, you've got real positioning for that target. Now do it for the next two.


If you can't, that's not a failure — it's a sign you need to do more research before you spend social capital reaching out.


Either way, you're working from something concrete instead of momentum and good instincts.


P.S. My next Ready to Land cohort starts March 2nd — 6 weeks, small group, built around exactly this kind of execution work. Enrollment closes Friday. Details here.

Related Posts

See All
#27 The market isn't the problem

Everyone’s talking about how hard the market is right now. Tech stocks are down. Hiring feels slower. The headlines make it sound like nobody’s moving. And yet — in the last 12 months, 10 of my 24 US

 
 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating

Get no-fluff guidance on career change, personal brand, job search strategy, and succeeding in new roles delivered to your inbox weekly. 

bottom of page